Indianapolis Employment Attorneys
Free Case Evaluation 317.537.9920
You Deserve to Be Heard

Indianapolis Non-Compete Agreements Lawyers

Legal Assistance with Non-Compete Clauses and Restrictive Covenants

Restrictive covenants are agreements that restrict your ability to compete with your former employer after you leave. You may be required to sign a non-compete agreement in order work for a company. The stated goal of these covenants is to protect trade secrets and other confidential material. However, employers will often use them as an intimidation tactic to prevent employees from leaving the company.

At Biesecker Dutkanych & Macer, LLC, our Indianapolis lawyers have more than 50 years of combined experience protecting the rights of employees. If you feel a non-compete clause in your employment contract is too restrictive, we can help you.

Call our Indianapolis law firm today for an evaluation at (317) 537-9920.

Examples of Restrictive Covenants

  • Non-compete clauses: One of the most common restrictive covenants, often broad in nature. Generally, these clauses will prevent you from working for a competing company or starting your own company that directly competes.
  • Non-recruitment / non-solicitation clauses: Restricts your ability to hire employees of your ex-employer for a length of time after employment is terminated.
  • Confidentiality provisions: Perhaps the most common form of restrictive covenants. These are often signed by employees outside of a contractual agreement. These restrict your ability to use any trade secrets or confidential information after you leave the company.

In most cases, other restrictive covenants are all seen as support for confidentiality provisions. These provisions restrict specific activities that could lead to a breach of said provisions.

Can Restrictive Covenants Be Enforced in Indiana?

In Indiana, judges decide if a non-compete is enforceable based on whether or not it is reasonable. The state of Indiana has some of the highest standards for non-compete agreements. Generally, such contracts or covenants are discouraged under Indiana law, as they can result in a power imbalance between employer and employee.

Below are the two main factors that determine the reasonableness of a non-compete agreement:

  • If the restriction is essential to protecting an employer's legitimate business interests
  • If the restriction itself is reasonable, allowing the employee to seek employment without being forced out of their profession

When it comes to protecting legitimate business interests, Indiana law recognizes an employer will want to protect certain advantageous factors. This includes good will, trade secrets, and confidential information. However, this would not cover something like the general experience gained by the employee during their employment.

In terms of determining the reasonability of the restriction, factors such as the period of time, geographic area, and activities restricted are considered. Non-competes will likely be unenforceable if they are intended to be in effect for several decades, or if they prohibit all competition from anywhere in the United States.

In some cases, the restrictions put forth by these covenants are fully legal and will be tough to combat. For many more employees, however, these agreements can be unlawfully restrictive and may even be challenged in court. Due to the complexity of these cases, it’s vital to contact an attorney with experience in non-compete law.

Contact Biesecker Dutkanych & Macer at (317) 537-9920

Our skilled attorneys have stood for the rights of employees for more than five decades. When you hire our firm, we will take the time to learn about your specific case. Our attorneys will craft a personalized, maximally effective legal strategy with your best interests in mind.

Retain a tireless advocate for your employment rights. Call Biesecker Dutkanych & Macer, LLC today at (317) 537-9920.

Hear it From
Our Clients

  • Resourceful, responsive, & tireless in his pursuit

    “Andrew Dutkanych provided legal counsel to me regarding my claim of wrongful termination, based on age and national origin factors. During the subsequent litigation, I found Andrew to be resourceful, responsive, and tireless in his pursuit of a remedy to this matter. Well versed in applicable law, I was also impressed by his grasp of the economics of my claim as well as his keen insight into the behaviors and motivation of the defendant and opposing counsel. Andrew acted as my "partner" during the litigation, and I was pleased that our strategies and decisions were well conceived and discussed beforehand. I was also pleased that Andrew was upfront with me in declaring that his intention was to "achieve a satisfactory agreement", and not to fight for the sake of fighting. The matter reached a successful conclusion, and I heartily recommend Andrew as an employment rights attorney.”

    S. N.

  • Knowledgeable, effective & always kept me informed.

    “I was wrongly and unfairly terminated by my employer. My Union Representative and attorney told me that I had no case or rights under state law. I met Kyle Biesecker and told him my story. He took my case and helped make my family and I whole again. I highly recommend Kyle Biesecker, he is knowledgeable, effective and always kept me informed.”

    J.S.

  • By far the best lawyer!

    “I had a great experience with your firm. Kyle Biesecker was the best. He was very friendly, open, and professional. He always kept me updated on the progress with my case. By far the best lawyer that I have had the pleasure of working with.”

    M.B.

  • He was honest and realistic

    “Andrew was extremely responsive anytime I emailed. He was also honest and realistic when discussing expectations. I have been very satisfied with our interactions and would definitely refer [him]!"”

    Susan Bunch

  • Ben put me at ease from the very first discussion.

    “Ben put me at ease from the very first discussion. My case was fairly easy for him. Ben kept me informed and made suggestions along the way. He made the best case for me and we won. You never win as much as you would have liked, but I feel Ben got the maximum for me in a timely and professional manner. I would highly recommend your firm to others who may have employment law issues. Thank you and Ben for helping me.”

    Roger Ambrose